Karelrybflot AO v Udovenko

Karelrybflot AO v Udovenko
CourtCourt of Appeal of New Zealand
Full case name AO KARELRYBFLOT v Appellant Arthur UDOVENKO and others Respondents
Decided17 December 1999
Citation[2000] 2 NZLR 24
TranscriptCourt of Appeal judgment
Court membership
Judges sittingRichardson P, Gault J, Keith J, Blanchard J, Tipping J

Karelrybflot AO v Udovenko [2000] 2 NZLR 24 is a cited case in New Zealand confirming that the doctrine of frustration can cover employment contracts.[1]

References

  1. ^ Chetwin, Maree; Graw, Stephen; Tiong, Raymond (2006). An introduction to the Law of Contract in New Zealand (4th ed.). Thomson Brookers. ISBN 0-86472-555-8.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.