In complex geometry, the Kähler identities are a collection of identities between operators on a Kähler manifold relating the Dolbeault operators and their adjoints, contraction and wedge operators of the Kähler form, and the Laplacians of the Kähler metric. The Kähler identities combine with results of Hodge theory to produce a number of relations on de Rham and Dolbeault cohomology of compact Kähler manifolds, such as the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem, the hard Lefschetz theorem, the Hodge-Riemann bilinear relations, and the Hodge index theorem. They are also, again combined with Hodge theory, important in proving fundamental analytical results on Kähler manifolds, such as the  -lemma, the Nakano inequalities, and the Kodaira vanishing theorem.
-lemma, the Nakano inequalities, and the Kodaira vanishing theorem.  
  History
 The Kähler identities were first proven by W. V. D. Hodge, appearing in his book on harmonic integrals in 1941.[1] The modern notation of  was introduced by André Weil in the first textbook on Kähler geometry, Introduction à L’Étude des Variétés Kähleriennes.[2]: 42
 was introduced by André Weil in the first textbook on Kähler geometry, Introduction à L’Étude des Variétés Kähleriennes.[2]: 42  
 The operators
 A Kähler manifold  admits a large number of operators on its algebra of complex differential forms
 admits a large number of operators on its algebra of complex differential forms built out of the smooth structure (S), complex structure (C), and Riemannian structure (R) of
built out of the smooth structure (S), complex structure (C), and Riemannian structure (R) of  . The construction of these operators is standard in the literature on complex differential geometry.[3][4][5][6][7] In the following the bold letters in brackets indicates which structures are needed to define the operator.
. The construction of these operators is standard in the literature on complex differential geometry.[3][4][5][6][7] In the following the bold letters in brackets indicates which structures are needed to define the operator.  
 Differential operators
 The following operators are differential operators and arise out of the smooth and complex structure of  :
: 
  , the exterior derivative. (S) , the exterior derivative. (S)
 , the , the -Dolbeault operator. (C) -Dolbeault operator. (C)
 , the , the -Dolbeault operator. (C) -Dolbeault operator. (C)
The Dolbeault operators are related directly to the exterior derivative by the formula  . The characteristic property of the exterior derivative that
. The characteristic property of the exterior derivative that  then implies
 then implies  and
 and  .
. 
Some sources make use of the following operator to phrase the Kähler identities. 
  .[Note 1] (C) .[Note 1] (C)
This operator is useful as the Kähler identities for  can be deduced from the more succinctly phrased identities of
 can be deduced from the more succinctly phrased identities of  by comparing bidegrees. It is also useful for the property that
 by comparing bidegrees. It is also useful for the property that  . It can be defined in terms of the complex structure operator
. It can be defined in terms of the complex structure operator  by the formula
 by the formula 
 
 Tensorial operators
 The following operators are tensorial in nature, that is they are operators which only depend on the value of the complex differential form at a point. In particular they can each be defined as operators between vector spaces of forms  at each point
 at each point  individually.
 individually.  
  , the complex conjugate operator. (C) , the complex conjugate operator. (C)
 , the Lefschetz operator defined by , the Lefschetz operator defined by where where is the Kähler form. (CR) is the Kähler form. (CR)
 , the Hodge star operator. (R) , the Hodge star operator. (R)
The direct sum decomposition of the complex differential forms into those of bidegree (p,q) manifests a number of projection operators. 
  , the projection onto the part of degree k. (S) , the projection onto the part of degree k. (S)
 , the projection onto the part of bidegree (p,q). (C) , the projection onto the part of bidegree (p,q). (C)
 , known as the counting operator.[3]: 34  (S) , known as the counting operator.[3]: 34  (S)
 , the complex structure operator on the complex vector space , the complex structure operator on the complex vector space . (C) . (C)
Notice the last operator is the extension of the almost complex structure  of the Kähler manifold to higher degree complex differential forms, where one recalls that
 of the Kähler manifold to higher degree complex differential forms, where one recalls that  for a
 for a  -form and
-form and  for a
 for a  -form, so
-form, so  acts with factor
 acts with factor  on a
 on a  -form.
-form. 
 Adjoints
 The Riemannian metric on  , as well as its natural orientation arising from the complex structure can be used to define formal adjoints of the above differential and tensorial operators. These adjoints may be defined either through integration by parts or by explicit formulas using the Hodge star operator
, as well as its natural orientation arising from the complex structure can be used to define formal adjoints of the above differential and tensorial operators. These adjoints may be defined either through integration by parts or by explicit formulas using the Hodge star operator  .
. 
To define the adjoints by integration, note that the Riemannian metric on  , defines an
, defines an  -inner product on
-inner product on  according to the formula
 according to the formula where
 where  is the inner product on the exterior products of the cotangent space of
 is the inner product on the exterior products of the cotangent space of  induced by the Riemannian metric. Using this
 induced by the Riemannian metric. Using this  -inner product, formal adjoints of any of the above operators (denoted by
-inner product, formal adjoints of any of the above operators (denoted by  ) can be defined by the formula
) can be defined by the formula  When the Kähler manifold is non-compact, the
When the Kähler manifold is non-compact, the  -inner product makes formal sense provided at least one of
-inner product makes formal sense provided at least one of  are compactly supported differential forms.
 are compactly supported differential forms.  
In particular one obtains the following formal adjoint operators of the above differential and tensorial operators. Included is the explicit formulae for these adjoints in terms of the Hodge star operator  .[Note 2]
.[Note 2] 
  explicitly given by explicitly given by . (SR) . (SR)
 explicitly given by explicitly given by . (CR) . (CR)
 explicitly given by explicitly given by . (CR) . (CR)
 explicitly given by explicitly given by . (CR) . (CR)
 explicitly given by explicitly given by . (CR) . (CR)
The last operator, the adjoint of the Lefschetz operator, is known as the contraction operator with the Kähler form  , and is commonly denoted by
, and is commonly denoted by  .
. 
 Laplacians
 Built out of the operators and their formal adjoints are a number of Laplace operators corresponding to  and
 and  :
: 
  , otherwise known as the Laplace–de Rham operator. (SR) , otherwise known as the Laplace–de Rham operator. (SR)
 . (CR) . (CR)
 . (CR) . (CR)
Each of the above Laplacians are self-adjoint operators.   
 Real and complex operators
 Even if the complex structure (C) is necessary to define the operators above, they may nevertheless be applied to real differential forms  . When the resulting form also has real coefficients, the operator is said to be a real operator. This can be further characterised in two ways: If the complex conjugate of the operator is itself, or if the operator commutes with the almost-complex structure
. When the resulting form also has real coefficients, the operator is said to be a real operator. This can be further characterised in two ways: If the complex conjugate of the operator is itself, or if the operator commutes with the almost-complex structure  acting on complex differential forms. The composition of two real operators is real.
 acting on complex differential forms. The composition of two real operators is real. 
The complex conjugate of the above operators are as follows: 
  and and . .
 and and and similarly for and similarly for and and . .
 and and . .
 . .
 . .
 and and . .
 . .
 . .
 . .
Thus  are all real operators. Moreover, in Kähler case,
 are all real operators. Moreover, in Kähler case,  and
 and  are real. In particular if any of these operators is denoted by
 are real. In particular if any of these operators is denoted by  , then the commutator
, then the commutator ![{\displaystyle [T,J]=0}](./_assets_/e0ea86574ef0e487d7b384364a91f7e18843f7cd.svg) where
 where  is the complex structure operator above.
 is the complex structure operator above. 
 The identities
 The Kähler identities are a list of commutator relationships between the above operators. Explicitly we denote by ![{\displaystyle [T,S]=T\circ S-S\circ T}](./_assets_/817deb1087b510bd4b89acd6e94902d9a9ea2a72.svg) the operator in
 the operator in  obtained through composition of the above operators in various degrees.
 obtained through composition of the above operators in various degrees.  
The Kähler identities are essentially local identities on the Kähler manifold, and hold even in the non-compact case. Indeed they can be proven in the model case of a Kähler metric on  and transferred to any Kähler manifold using the key property that the Kähler condition
 and transferred to any Kähler manifold using the key property that the Kähler condition  implies that the Kähler metric takes the standard form up to second order. Since the Kähler identities are first order identities in the Kähler metric, the corresponding commutator relations on
 implies that the Kähler metric takes the standard form up to second order. Since the Kähler identities are first order identities in the Kähler metric, the corresponding commutator relations on  imply the Kähler identities locally on any Kähler manifold.[4]: Ch 0 §7
 imply the Kähler identities locally on any Kähler manifold.[4]: Ch 0 §7   
When the Kähler manifold is compact the identities can be combined with Hodge theory to conclude many results about the cohomology of the manifold. 
  Kähler identities[3]: §3.1 [6]: §5.1 [7]: Ch V §4 —Let  be a Kähler manifold. Then the following identities hold:
 be a Kähler manifold. Then the following identities hold: 
 ![{\displaystyle [{\bar {\partial }},L]=0}](./_assets_/b60ebb6c6555b2b6e829653f176d8eb3122101e7.svg) . .
![{\displaystyle [\partial ,L]=0}](./_assets_/b32b83d6223e2e2d624f1e6a86157a5ffd05a2cc.svg) . .
![{\displaystyle [{\bar {\partial }}^{*},\Lambda ]=0}](./_assets_/3f58a698794f863a66525ee849e6052e093b73fc.svg) . .
![{\displaystyle [\partial ^{*},\Lambda ]=0}](./_assets_/db4c12d875a0a9a44252ed90d61aa6a2f18cfa43.svg) . .
![{\displaystyle [{\bar {\partial }}^{*},L]=i\partial }](./_assets_/5e7883ecf4e67d20b6d15e1bec05ad6242c98185.svg) . .
![{\displaystyle [\partial ^{*},L]=-i{\bar {\partial }}}](./_assets_/c3c586fe00d6770ddff79204e9ba6f6045c362fa.svg) . .
![{\displaystyle [\Lambda ,{\bar {\partial }}]=-i\partial ^{*}}](./_assets_/43bc4481ddd57e874cba97b04b376211b40253c0.svg) . .
![{\displaystyle [\Lambda ,\partial ]=i{\bar {\partial }}^{*}}](./_assets_/f62aba217719ee9412fc89bd6402181ae33e69a3.svg) . .
 . .
 commutes with all of commutes with all of and and . It also commutes with . It also commutes with and hence and hence preserves bidegree (p,q). preserves bidegree (p,q).
Furthermore the operators  and
 and  satisfy the identities:
 satisfy the identities: 
 ![{\displaystyle [\Lambda ,d]=-2{d^{c}}^{*}}](./_assets_/c7eac37a2d8549aa2c8df61e136975be9d68755b.svg) . .
![{\displaystyle [L,d]=0}](./_assets_/a7a89ad7c97e2cbeb7ec072df097fac456182a09.svg) . .
![{\displaystyle [\Lambda ,d^{c}]=0}](./_assets_/86dc0408416f9c118e1b920849e30b60269320ec.svg) . .
![{\displaystyle [L,d^{*}]=2d^{c}}](./_assets_/35c2c067b6938fc75ce91b74101d74bbced12c8e.svg) . .
  The above Kähler identities can be upgraded in the case where the differential operators  are paired with a Chern connection on a holomorphic vector bundle
 are paired with a Chern connection on a holomorphic vector bundle  . If
. If  is a Hermitian metric on
 is a Hermitian metric on  and
 and  is a Dolbeault operator defining the holomorphic structure of
 is a Dolbeault operator defining the holomorphic structure of  , then the unique compatible Chern connection
, then the unique compatible Chern connection  and its
 and its  -part
-part  satisfy
 satisfy  . Denote the curvature form of the Chern connection by
. Denote the curvature form of the Chern connection by  . The formal adjoints may be defined similarly to above using an
. The formal adjoints may be defined similarly to above using an  -inner product where the Hermitian metric is combined with the inner product on forms. In this case all the Kähler identities, sometimes called the Nakano identities,[3]: Lem 5.2.3  hold without change, except for the following:[5]: Ch VII §1 [6]: §5.1
-inner product where the Hermitian metric is combined with the inner product on forms. In this case all the Kähler identities, sometimes called the Nakano identities,[3]: Lem 5.2.3  hold without change, except for the following:[5]: Ch VII §1 [6]: §5.1  
 ![{\displaystyle [L,\Delta _{{\bar {\partial }}_{E}}]=-iF\wedge -}](./_assets_/19e0cadd6fe1872d32ca6d65ff878fa9e03f9655.svg) . .
![{\displaystyle [L,\Delta _{\partial _{E}}]=iF\wedge -}](./_assets_/51f0f6f59aac25ec09445d574523608559ed86ad.svg) . .
 . .
![{\displaystyle \Delta _{{\bar {\partial }}_{E}}-\Delta _{\partial _{E}}=[iF\wedge -,\Lambda ]}](./_assets_/80b13aa21bd5aa17b3bfafef2da15dc3d975215d.svg) , known as the Bochner–Kodaira–Nakano identity.[5]: Ch VII § 1 , known as the Bochner–Kodaira–Nakano identity.[5]: Ch VII § 1
In particular note that when the Chern connection associated to  is a flat connection, so that the curvature
 is a flat connection, so that the curvature  , one still obtains the relationship that
, one still obtains the relationship that  .
. 
 Primitive cohomology and representation of sl(2,C)
 In addition to the commutation relations contained in the Kähler identities, some of the above operators satisfy other interesting commutation relations. In particular recall the Lefschetz operator  , the contraction operator
, the contraction operator  , and the counting operator
, and the counting operator  above. Then one can show the following commutation relations:[3]: Prop 1.2.26
 above. Then one can show the following commutation relations:[3]: Prop 1.2.26  
 ![{\displaystyle [\Pi ,L]=2L}](./_assets_/98da4491a669e052a6a24c0ed0a1ee7d69eef915.svg) . .
![{\displaystyle [\Pi ,\Lambda ]=-2\Lambda }](./_assets_/6060f245b5ade0e229069a5f5fd7564ba69026f3.svg) . .
![{\displaystyle [L,\Lambda ]=\Pi }](./_assets_/e463e85a0df77ae4ce5d572c29c09abda9ea4409.svg) . .
Comparing with the Lie algebra  , one sees that
, one sees that  form an sl2-triple, and therefore the algebra
 form an sl2-triple, and therefore the algebra  of complex differential forms on a Kähler manifold becomes a representation of
 of complex differential forms on a Kähler manifold becomes a representation of  . The Kähler identities imply the operators
. The Kähler identities imply the operators  all commute with
 all commute with  and therefore preserve the harmonic forms inside
 and therefore preserve the harmonic forms inside  . In particular when the Kähler manifold is compact, by applying the Hodge decomposition the triple of operators
. In particular when the Kähler manifold is compact, by applying the Hodge decomposition the triple of operators  descend to give an sl2-triple on the de Rham cohomology of X.
 descend to give an sl2-triple on the de Rham cohomology of X.  
In the language of representation theory of  , the operator
, the operator  is the raising operator and
 is the raising operator and  is the lowering operator. When
 is the lowering operator. When  is compact, it is a consequence of Hodge theory that the cohomology groups
 is compact, it is a consequence of Hodge theory that the cohomology groups  are finite-dimensional. Therefore the cohomology
 are finite-dimensional. Therefore the cohomology admits a direct sum decomposition into irreducible finite-dimensional representations of
admits a direct sum decomposition into irreducible finite-dimensional representations of  .[7]: Ch V §3  Any such irreducible representation comes with a primitive element, which is an element
.[7]: Ch V §3  Any such irreducible representation comes with a primitive element, which is an element  such that
 such that  . The primitive cohomology of
. The primitive cohomology of  is given by
 is given by  The primitive cohomology also admits a direct sum splitting
The primitive cohomology also admits a direct sum splitting 
 
 Hard Lefschetz decomposition
 The representation theory of  describes completely an irreducible representation in terms of its primitive element. If
 describes completely an irreducible representation in terms of its primitive element. If  is a non-zero primitive element, then since differential forms vanish above dimension
 is a non-zero primitive element, then since differential forms vanish above dimension  , the chain
, the chain  eventually terminates after finitely many powers of
 eventually terminates after finitely many powers of  . This defines a finite-dimensional vector space
. This defines a finite-dimensional vector space  which has an
which has an  -action induced from the triple
-action induced from the triple  . This is the irreducible representation corresponding to
. This is the irreducible representation corresponding to  . Applying this simultaneously to each primitive cohomology group, the splitting of cohomology
. Applying this simultaneously to each primitive cohomology group, the splitting of cohomology  into its irreducible representations becomes known as the hard Lefschetz decomposition of the compact Kähler manifold.
 into its irreducible representations becomes known as the hard Lefschetz decomposition of the compact Kähler manifold. 
  Hard Lefschetz decomposition[6]: Thm 5.27 [3]: Prop 3.3.13 [5]: Ch VI Thm 8.17 —Let  be a compact Kähler manifold. Then the de Rham cohomology of
 be a compact Kähler manifold. Then the de Rham cohomology of  admits an orthogonal direct sum decomposition
 admits an orthogonal direct sum decomposition  This decomposition is compatible with the Hodge decomposition into Dolbeault cohomology groups:
 This decomposition is compatible with the Hodge decomposition into Dolbeault cohomology groups:  In addition
 In addition 
 - If  , then , then . .
- The map  is injective for is injective for , and restricts to give an injection , and restricts to give an injection for each (p,q) such that for each (p,q) such that . .
- The map  is bijective for is bijective for , and restricts to give a bijection , and restricts to give a bijection for each (p,q) such that for each (p,q) such that . .
- If  , then , then , and furthermore , and furthermore . .
  By the Kähler identities paired with a holomorphic vector bundle, in the case where the holomorphic bundle is flat the Hodge decomposition extends to the twisted de Rham cohomology groups  and the Dolbeault cohomology groups
 and the Dolbeault cohomology groups  . The triple
. The triple  still acts as an sl2-triple on the bundle-valued cohomology, and the a version of the Hard Lefschetz decomposition holds in this case.[6]: Thm 5.31
 still acts as an sl2-triple on the bundle-valued cohomology, and the a version of the Hard Lefschetz decomposition holds in this case.[6]: Thm 5.31  
 Nakano inequalities
 The Nakano inequalities are a pair of inequalities associated to inner products of harmonic differential forms with the curvature of a Chern connection on a holomorphic vector bundle over a compact Kähler manifold. In particular let  be a Hermitian holomorphic vector bundle over a compact Kähler manifold
 be a Hermitian holomorphic vector bundle over a compact Kähler manifold  , and let
, and let  denote the curvature of the associated Chern connection. The Nakano inequalities state that if
 denote the curvature of the associated Chern connection. The Nakano inequalities state that if  is harmonic, that is,
 is harmonic, that is,  , then[7]: Ch VI Prop 2.5
, then[7]: Ch VI Prop 2.5  
  , and , and
 . .
These inequalities may be proven by applying the Kähler identities coupled to a holomorphic vector bundle as described above. In case where  is an ample line bundle, the Chern curvature
 is an ample line bundle, the Chern curvature  is itself a Kähler metric on
 is itself a Kähler metric on  . Applying the Nakano inequalities in this case proves the Kodaira–Nakano vanishing theorem for compact Kähler manifolds.
. Applying the Nakano inequalities in this case proves the Kodaira–Nakano vanishing theorem for compact Kähler manifolds. 
 Notes
   - ^ Some sources use the coefficients  , , , or just , or just in the definition of in the definition of for notational convenience. With the first convention, the Ricci form of a Kähler metric has the local form for notational convenience. With the first convention, the Ricci form of a Kähler metric has the local form . These conventions change the Kähler identities for . These conventions change the Kähler identities for by an appropriate constant. by an appropriate constant.
- ^ Note that the sign  (see Codifferential) in front of the adjoint (see Codifferential) in front of the adjoint becomes becomes in all degrees since the dimension in all degrees since the dimension of the complex manifold of the complex manifold is even. is even.
  References
   - ^ Hodge, W.V.D., 1989. The theory and applications of harmonic integrals. CUP Archive. 
- ^ Weil, A., 1958. Introduction à l'étude des variétés kählériennes 
- ^ a b c d e f Huybrechts, D., 2005. Complex geometry: an introduction (Vol. 78). Berlin: Springer. 
- ^ a b Griffiths, P. and Harris, J., 2014. Principles of algebraic geometry. John Wiley & Sons. 
- ^ a b c d Demailly, J.P., 2012. Analytic methods in algebraic geometry (Vol. 1). Somerville, MA: International Press. 
- ^ a b c d e Ballmann, W., 2006. Lectures on Kähler manifolds (Vol. 2). European mathematical society. 
- ^ a b c d Wells, R.O.N. and García-Prada, O., 1980. Differential analysis on complex manifolds (Vol. 21980). New York: Springer.