Vermont v. Brillon
| Vermont v. Brillon | |
|---|---|
![]() | |
| Argued January 13, 2009 Decided March 9, 2009 | |
| Full case name | Vermont v. Michael Brillon |
| Docket no. | 08-88 |
| Citations | 556 U.S. 81 (more) 129 S. Ct. 1283 |
| Holding | |
| Delay caused by appointed counsel attributed to the defense, rather than the government, under the Speedy Trial Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Ginsburg, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, and Alito |
| Dissent | Breyer, joined by Stevens |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Constitution Amend. VI | |
Vermont v. Brillon, 556 U.S. 81 (2009), decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that trial delay caused by a criminal defendant's public defender should be attributed to the defense, rather than the government, under the Speedy Trial Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.[1]: 219–220
See also
- Barker v. Wingo (1972)
References
- ^ LeNaire, Lewis (Spring 2010). "Vermont v. Brillon: Public Defense and the Sixth Amendment Right to a Speedy Trial". Oklahoma City University Law Review. 35 (1): 219–242 – via HeinOnline.
External links
- Text of Vermont v. Brillon, 556 U.S. 81 (2009) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Oyez (oral argument audio)
