2015 Sham Shui Po District Council election
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 23 seats to Sham Shui Po District Council 12 seats needed for a majority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnout | 50.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Colours on map indicate winning party for each constituency. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The 2015 Sham Shui Po District Council election was held on 22 November 2015 to elect all 23 members to the Sham Shui Po District Council.[1]
Veteran legislator Frederick Fung Kin-kee of the Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood (ADPL) lost his seat in Lai Kok to Chan Wing-yan of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB) and the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions (FTU).
Overall election results
Before election:
| 7 | 14 |
| Pro-democracy | Pro-Beijing |
Change in composition:
| 11 | 12 |
| Pro-democracy | Pro-Beijing |
| Party | Seats | Gains | Losses | Net gain/loss | Seats % | Votes % | Votes | +/− | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADPL | 9 | 3 | 3 | +2 | 39.1 | 30.1 | 26,318 | −5.5 | |
| KWND | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17.4 | 20.2 | 17,650 | ||
| DAB | 5 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 21.7 | 17.8 | 15,564 | −1.5 | |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.3 | 10.8 | 9,493 | ||
| Civic | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4.3 | 6.6 | 5,812 | +1.1 | |
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4.3 | 2.7 | 2,353 | +1.3 | |
| Liberal | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4.3 | 2.6 | 2,277 | ||
| FTU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.9 | 1,678 | ||
| FLU | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 1,544 | –0.2 | |
| Civic Passion | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 1,160 | ||
| Socialist Action | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 1,152 | ||
| LSD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 | 982 | +0.4 | |
| CYSRC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 | 786 | +0.1 | |
References
- ^ "Election Results - Overall Results". Electoral Affairs Commission.
