Pascal's triangle, rows 0 through 7. The hockey stick identity confirms, for example: for n =6, r =2: 1+3+6+10+15=35. In combinatorics , the hockey-stick identity ,[ 1] Christmas stocking identity ,[ 2] boomerang identity , Fermat's identity or Chu's Theorem ,[ 3] states that if n ≥ r ≥ 0 {\displaystyle n\geq r\geq 0} are integers, then
( r r ) + ( r + 1 r ) + ( r + 2 r ) + ⋯ + ( n r ) = ( n + 1 r + 1 ) . {\displaystyle {\binom {r}{r}}+{\binom {r+1}{r}}+{\binom {r+2}{r}}+\cdots +{\binom {n}{r}}={\binom {n+1}{r+1}}.} The name stems from the graphical representation of the identity on Pascal's triangle : when the addends represented in the summation and the sum itself are highlighted, the shape revealed is vaguely reminiscent of those objects (see hockey stick , Christmas stocking ).
Using sigma notation , the identity states
∑ i = r n ( i r ) = ( n + 1 r + 1 ) for n , r ∈ N , n ≥ r {\displaystyle \sum _{i=r}^{n}{i \choose r}={n+1 \choose r+1}\qquad {\text{ for }}n,r\in \mathbb {N} ,\quad n\geq r} or equivalently, the mirror-image by the substitution j → i − r {\displaystyle j\to i-r} , and by using the identify ( n k ) = ( n n − k ) {\displaystyle {n \choose k}={n \choose n-k}} :
∑ j = 0 n − r ( j + r r ) = ∑ j = 0 n − r ( j + r j ) = ( n + 1 n − r ) for n , r ∈ N , n ≥ r . {\displaystyle \sum _{j=0}^{n-r}{j+r \choose r}=\sum _{j=0}^{n-r}{j+r \choose j}={n+1 \choose n-r}\qquad {\text{ for }}n,r\in \mathbb {N} ,\quad n\geq r.}
Proofs
Inductive and algebraic proofs The inductive and algebraic proofs both make use of Pascal's identity :
( n k ) = ( n − 1 k − 1 ) + ( n − 1 k ) . {\displaystyle {n \choose k}={n-1 \choose k-1}+{n-1 \choose k}.}
Inductive proof This identity can be proven by mathematical induction on n {\displaystyle n} .
Base case Let n = r {\displaystyle n=r} ;
∑ i = r n ( i r ) = ∑ i = r r ( i r ) = ( r r ) = 1 = ( r + 1 r + 1 ) = ( n + 1 r + 1 ) . {\displaystyle \sum _{i=r}^{n}{i \choose r}=\sum _{i=r}^{r}{i \choose r}={r \choose r}=1={r+1 \choose r+1}={n+1 \choose r+1}.} Inductive step Suppose, for some k ∈ N , k ⩾ r {\displaystyle k\in \mathbb {N} ,k\geqslant r} ,
∑ i = r k ( i r ) = ( k + 1 r + 1 ) {\displaystyle \sum _{i=r}^{k}{i \choose r}={k+1 \choose r+1}} Then
∑ i = r k + 1 ( i r ) = ( ∑ i = r k ( i r ) ) + ( k + 1 r ) = ( k + 1 r + 1 ) + ( k + 1 r ) = ( k + 2 r + 1 ) . {\displaystyle \sum _{i=r}^{k+1}{i \choose r}=\left(\sum _{i=r}^{k}{i \choose r}\right)+{k+1 \choose r}={k+1 \choose r+1}+{k+1 \choose r}={k+2 \choose r+1}.}
Algebraic proof We use a telescoping argument to simplify the computation of the sum:
∑ t = 0 n ( t k ) = ∑ t = k n ( t k ) = ∑ t = k n [ ( t + 1 k + 1 ) − ( t k + 1 ) ] = ∑ t = k n ( t + 1 k + 1 ) − ∑ t = k n ( t k + 1 ) = ∑ t = k + 1 n + 1 ( t k + 1 ) − ∑ t = k n ( t k + 1 ) = ( n + 1 k + 1 ) − ( k k + 1 ) ⏟ 0 by telescoping = ( n + 1 k + 1 ) . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\sum _{t=\color {blue}0}^{n}{\binom {t}{k}}=\sum _{t=\color {blue}k}^{n}{\binom {t}{k}}&=\sum _{t=k}^{n}\left[{\binom {t+1}{k+1}}-{\binom {t}{k+1}}\right]\\&=\sum _{t=\color {green}k}^{\color {green}n}{\binom {\color {green}{t+1}}{k+1}}-\sum _{t=k}^{n}{\binom {t}{k+1}}\\&=\sum _{t=\color {green}{k+1}}^{\color {green}{n+1}}{\binom {\color {green}{t}}{k+1}}-\sum _{t=k}^{n}{\binom {t}{k+1}}\\&={\binom {n+1}{k+1}}-\underbrace {\binom {k}{k+1}} _{0}&&{\text{by telescoping}}\\&={\binom {n+1}{k+1}}.\end{aligned}}}
Combinatorial proofs
Proof 1 Imagine that we are distributing n {\displaystyle n} indistinguishable candies to k {\displaystyle k} distinguishable children. By a direct application of the stars and bars method , there are
( n + k − 1 k − 1 ) {\displaystyle {\binom {n+k-1}{k-1}}} ways to do this. Alternatively, we can first give 0 ⩽ i ⩽ n {\displaystyle 0\leqslant i\leqslant n} candies to the oldest child so that we are essentially giving n − i {\displaystyle n-i} candies to k − 1 {\displaystyle k-1} kids and again, with stars and bars and double counting , we have
( n + k − 1 k − 1 ) = ∑ i = 0 n ( n + k − 2 − i k − 2 ) , {\displaystyle {\binom {n+k-1}{k-1}}=\sum _{i=0}^{n}{\binom {n+k-2-i}{k-2}},} which simplifies to the desired result by taking n ′ = n + k − 2 {\displaystyle n'=n+k-2} and r = k − 2 {\displaystyle r=k-2} , and noticing that n ′ − n = k − 2 = r {\displaystyle n'-n=k-2=r} :
( n ′ + 1 r + 1 ) = ∑ i = 0 n ( n ′ − i r ) = ∑ i = r n ′ ( i r ) . {\displaystyle {\binom {n'+1}{r+1}}=\sum _{i=0}^{n}{\binom {n'-i}{r}}=\sum _{i=r}^{n'}{\binom {i}{r}}.}
Proof 2 We can form a committee of size k + 1 {\displaystyle k+1} from a group of n + 1 {\displaystyle n+1} people in
( n + 1 k + 1 ) {\displaystyle {\binom {n+1}{k+1}}} ways. Now we hand out the numbers 1 , 2 , 3 , … , n − k + 1 {\displaystyle 1,2,3,\dots ,n-k+1} to n − k + 1 {\displaystyle n-k+1} of the n + 1 {\displaystyle n+1} people. We can then divide our committee-forming process into n − k + 1 {\displaystyle n-k+1} exhaustive and disjoint cases based on the committee member with the lowest number, x {\displaystyle x} . Note that there are only k {\displaystyle k} people without numbers, meaning we must choose at least one person with a number in order to form a committee of k + 1 {\displaystyle k+1} people. In general, in case x {\displaystyle x} , person x {\displaystyle x} is on the committee and persons 1 , 2 , 3 , … , x − 1 {\displaystyle 1,2,3,\dots ,x-1} are not on the committee. The rest of the committee can then be chosen in
( n − x + 1 k ) {\displaystyle {\binom {n-x+1}{k}}} ways. Now we can sum the values of these n − k + 1 {\displaystyle n-k+1} disjoint cases, and using double counting , we obtain
( n + 1 k + 1 ) = ( n k ) + ( n − 1 k ) + ( n − 2 k ) + ⋯ + ( k + 1 k ) + ( k k ) . {\displaystyle {\binom {n+1}{k+1}}={\binom {n}{k}}+{\binom {n-1}{k}}+{\binom {n-2}{k}}+\cdots +{\binom {k+1}{k}}+{\binom {k}{k}}.}
Generating function proof Let X = 1 + x {\displaystyle X=1+x} . Then, by the partial sum formula for geometric series , we find that
X r + X r + 1 + ⋯ + X n = X r − X n + 1 1 − X = X n + 1 − X r x {\displaystyle X^{r}+X^{r+1}+\dots +X^{n}={\frac {X^{r}-X^{n+1}}{1-X}}={\frac {X^{n+1}-X^{r}}{x}}} . Further, by the binomial theorem , we also find that
X r + k = ( 1 + x ) r + k = ∑ i = 0 r + k ( r + k i ) x i {\displaystyle X^{r+k}=(1+x)^{r+k}=\sum _{i=0}^{r+k}{\binom {r+k}{i}}x^{i}} .
Note that this means the coefficient of x r {\displaystyle x^{r}} in X r + k {\displaystyle X^{r+k}} is given by ( r + k r ) {\displaystyle {\binom {r+k}{r}}} .
Thus, the coefficient of x r {\displaystyle x^{r}} in the left hand side of our first equation can be obtained by summing over the coefficients of x r {\displaystyle x^{r}} from each term, which gives
∑ k = 0 n − r ( r + k r ) {\displaystyle \sum _{k=0}^{n-r}{\binom {r+k}{r}}}
Similarly, we find that the coefficient of x r {\displaystyle x^{r}} on the right hand side is given by the coefficient of x r + 1 {\displaystyle x^{r+1}} in X n + 1 − X r {\displaystyle X^{n+1}-X^{r}} , which is
( n + 1 r + 1 ) − ( r r + 1 ) = ( n + 1 r + 1 ) {\displaystyle {\binom {n+1}{r+1}}-{\binom {r}{r+1}}={\binom {n+1}{r+1}}}
Therefore, we can compare the coefficients of x r {\displaystyle x^{r}} on each side of the equation to find that
∑ k = 0 n − r ( r + k r ) = ( n + 1 r + 1 ) {\displaystyle \sum _{k=0}^{n-r}{\binom {r+k}{r}}={\binom {n+1}{r+1}}}
See also
References ^ CH Jones (1996) Generalized Hockey Stick Identities and N-Dimensional Block Walking. Fibonacci Quarterly 34 (3), 280-288. ^ W., Weisstein, Eric. "Christmas Stocking Theorem" . mathworld.wolfram.com . Retrieved 2016-11-01 . {{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) ^ Merris, Russell (2003). Combinatorics (2nd ed.). Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Interscience. p. 45. ISBN 0-471-45849-X . OCLC 53121765 .
External links